Tag Archives: muslim brotherhood

While the West is obsessed with Russia, it is being devoured from within by Salafist, Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist terror cells which are forming an alliance against democracy with Antifa and Black Lives Matter

The West continues to enjoy playing “Russian Roulette”


While the West is busy hunting “Russian witches,” its sworn enemies devour it alive from within.

In 1986, the manager of the largest state company in France, Eurodif Georges Besse, arrived at his office as usual. When he got out of his car, he was shot at point-blank range by unknown people on a motorcycle. Initially the authorities accused the left radical Action Directe, but very soon the intelligence service found the Iranian trace.

The Iranians, who owned shares of Eurodif, demanded Paris pay them the dividends that were frozen after the Islamic revolution. The murder of Besse was a blatant threat and it worked. France not only failed to expel Iranian diplomats, but paid Tehran more than $1.6 billion in 1991.

Politics of the West is determined by the dominant discourse. That is why the murder of Besse remained unnoticed and unpunished, but the case of Skripal (very doubtful in itself) led to a mass hysteria.

Western political consciousness is schematic and one-sided. It forms its own Manichean mythology with ominous forces, martyrs, cunning conspirators and innocent victims. What can be a better illustration of this perception of the world than the blind faith that even now, after the collapse of the Arab world, it is the “Israeli occupation” that remains the source of all troubles in the Middle East and in the world?

I am not a supporter of the current regime in the Kremlin, and in Russia I would choose to vote for Ksenia Sobchak. I’m extremely disgusted by the murderous manipulations in the east of Ukraine. I’m alarmed by the military hysteria and whitewashing of such monstrosities as Stalin and Ivan the Terrible. I am worried that national consciousness is carrying the idea of future tyranny.

However it is also obvious to me that Russia was chosen for the role of the universal villain long before the case of Skripal. Bombing Serbia, provocative expansion of NATO to the East, the missile defense complex in Poland, absurd campaigns for rights of LGBT in Russia, blaming Russia for all failures and misfortunes – from hackers who allegedly changed the course of the elections in the US to “Brexit” – Russia has been demonized on the most trivial pretext.

Putin wouldn’t be able to destroy the West, even if he wanted to. He has no tools for this: neither a radical ideology like the communist one, nor the “Trojan horse” as a bearer of such ideology.

However, such ideology and its bearers exist in other countries that are eager to conquer the West. Alien trans-territorial entities have been formed in its body: nests of hatred, ignorance and fanaticism controlled by Islamists – the Muslim Brotherhood (MB), Salafis and Shiite Hezbollah. All of them are presented by political movements and parties. All of them are financed by Turkey, Iran and Qatar. Like a wasp larva in the body of a living victim, they poison and devour their carrier from inside.

According to Sweden’s Civil Contingencies Agency dated March 2017, MB controls the Muslim community. In December 2017, Chief Prosecutor Lise Tamm compared the Stockholm suburb of Rinkeby with the so called “war zones” in Columbia occupied by drug dealers, criminal bands and insurgent groups.

The representative of the Danish “Venstre” party, Preben Bang Henriksen, said that in terms of safety the situation was the worst after WWII.

In August, German BfV claimed that Salafists were preparing local Muslims for disorders that would be accompanied by group and individual terrorism. Muslim bikers and “Sharia police” patrol streets of cities in the name of fighting against islamophobia.

“…We see it (Islamist terrorism) as one of the biggest threats facing the internal security of Germany,” said Hans-Georg Maassen, head of the German Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution.

Still, they are afraid of Russian hackers in the Bundestag.

It is not Putin, it is Erdogan who promised Europe “religious wars”, and it is not Russians, Germans and Jews, but Muslims, who will become “cannon fodder” in these wars.

It was not Moscow, it was Tehran and Hezbollah that created the Shia network in Germany with a center in Hamburg and “sleeping cells” in North Rhine-Westphalia.

In France, Union des Organisations Islamiques de France (UOIF) and its mother organization Federation of Islamic Organizations in Europe (FIOE) are branches of MB.

In October 2016, a youth gang besieged the Hélène-Boucher school in Seine-Saint-Denis. They attacked the building with firebombs and beat the director. Yacine, 21 years old, a student at the University of Paris, said: “This is a warning. These young people don’t act spontaneously; they attack institutions, the State itself.” Did anybody listen to her?

It was Qatar, not Russia, that invested 50 million Euro for establishing Sharia in French cities in 2012. Qatari Emir Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al-Thani subsidizes radical groups all over the world.

“Everyone knows that all mosques in Brussels are in the hands of Salafists”, said former Brussels mayor Yvan Mayeur. In Molenbeek alone, there are 51 organizations connected with terrorism.

The new Muslim party “Be.One” headed by Lebanese founder of the European Arab League Dyab Abou Jahjah is a branch of Erdogan’s Justice and Development Party – abbreviated officially AK Parti in Turkish,- a part of MB. The same can be said about Denk Party in Holland.

The Austrian Party Neue Bewegung für die Zukunft (New Movement for the Future) is the “fifth column” of the new Turkish sultan, and he doesn’t even hide it.

Pakistan-born journalist Shams Ul-Haq lived in asylum homes across the country under the guise of a migrant. He said that Salafists invaded minds of migrants and triggered religious hatred by recruiting them into militias.

Sebastian Kurtz is one of the few Western leaders who understands that it is they, not Putin, who represent a strategic threat to his country.

In Spain, which is still called Andalus by Arabs, back in 1985, Saudis opened the Islamic Cultural Center (Madrid), which was the Europe’s second largest mosque after the the Islamic Center of Malaga, and launched a new TV Channel Córdoba TV. The Sheikh of Qatar is planning to buy the famous La Monumental Arena in Barcelona to turn it into the Europe’s biggest mosque. UAE subsidized the building of the Great Mosque of Granada, and Kuwait is funding the construction of mosques in Reus and Torredembarra.

Iran subsidizes the popular left-wing radical party “Podemos.”   Is this also the Kremlin’s hand?

According to a report by the Henry Jackson Society dated July 2017, Middle Eastern countries provide financial support to mosques and Islamic educational institutions in the UK. Tom Brake, a Liberal Democrat and foreign affairs spokesman, said that Saudi Arabia funded hundreds of Wahhabist mosques in the country. A counterinsurgency expert, Tom Collins, warned about the MB danger. He called it a terrorist organization and underlined that Qatar funded the organization. According to the Jenkins Commission report, MB is a dangerous and violence-prone organization threatening the national interests of the country.

Britain is building an alliance against Moscow.

In the US they found out about MB plans back in 1991 after one of their activists had written a memorandum about civilized jihad in America. MB’s activity is still a mystery. “I’ve been studying the Brotherhood for 15 years,” says Lorenzo Vidino, director the Program on Extremism at George Washington University.  “I maybe understand 10 percent of how it works,” adding that “… it is clearly linked to the Brotherhood abroad” .

MB in USA is closely connected to the Holy Land Foundation, which transferred funds to Hamas.  MB is also represented by CAIR, which was declared a terrorist group in UAE. In 2008 FBI Special Agent Lara Burns labeled CAIR a front group for Hamas, and in January 2009 the FBI’s DC cut ties with CAIR.

However MB hasn’t been banned and is forming an alliance against American democracy together with Antifa and Black Life Matters.  At same time Iran and Hezbollah founded a branched network in Latin America and US. “…Hezbollah is determined to give itself a potential homeland option as a critical component of its terrorism playbook,”  said Nicholas Rasmussen, Director of National Counterterrorism Center, after recent arrests of alleged “Hezbollah” operatives in New York and Michigan.

Nevertheless the US continues to be obsessed with “hunting Russian witches”.

Allow me to remind you of something.

Not in Moscow, but in Teheran, homosexuals are hanged on construction cranes.

Not in St. Petersburg, but in Istanbul, journalists, teachers, professors and public figures are rotting alive in jails.

Not in Russia, but in Iran, political prisoners are raped in prisons.

Not Russia, but Turkey, carries out ethnic cleansing of Kurds.

Not in Russia, but in Qatar, they established an institute of badly disguised slavery.

It is not Russia regularly provoking NATO members, it is Turkey doing this to Greece and Cyprus. The West forgives them all of their abominations.

Four centuries ago, the West did everything to undermine Byzantium and achieved its goal. Half a century later, however, the Ottoman Muslim hordes stood right under the gates of Vienna.

It appears”Russian Roulette” will always be a favorite game of the West.


[From an article written by Alexander Maistrovoy and published by ISRAEL NATIONAL NEWS]




As always, posted for your edification and enlightenment by

NORM ‘n’ AL, Minneapolis





Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

By the definition of treason given in the US Constitution, both Obama and Clinton are guilty

According to the US Constitution, both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are guilty of treason and should be charged, tried, convicted and appropriately punished by the forfeiture of their lives.

Article 3, Section 3 of the Constitution states:

“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.”

“The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.”

I’m sure given enough time and space, one could fill volumes with incidences from Obama and Clinton that would fall under the Constitution’s definition of treason, but all it takes is one conviction to put them in front of a firing squad, but I’ll show more than one cause, at least for Obama.

Libya – Obama – Obama assisted in the overthrow of Libyan dictator Muamar Gadhafi. Obama supplied weapons and air support for the rebels that eventually took control of the government. So who were these rebels? According to some Libyan sources, many of the rebel leaders who ended up in key government positions were members of al Qaeda. Furthermore, the Libyan sources claim that the same members of al Qaeda that Obama helped put into power in Libya were also responsible for the attack on the Us Embassy compound in Benghazi and the murder of US Ambassador Stevens and the three other brave Americans.

“For example, Abdul Wahhab Hassan Qayed now works in the Libyan Interior Ministry where he has been put in control over Libya’s borders. He is the brother to Abu Yahya al-Libi. Qayed, a recently assassinated member of Al Qaeda. Under his oversight, Al Qaeda operatives are being free access to cross the border into Libya where they have been welcomed.”

“Another example is that of Fadlallah Haran Musa and Khalid Atiyeh. Both men have ties to Al Qaeda and have been placed in important government roles. Musa has been made head of the National Security Fares in Barqa (eastern Libya) and Atiyeh has been assigned to be Musa’s assistant.”

Sufyan Gammu is still one of the most sought after members of Al Qaeda, largely because he had served as Osama bin Laden’s personal driver. Information states that he is now living openly in Libya under the protection of the new government, again with the cooperation of the Obama administration.’

Salem Al-Barrani Dirbi, also of Al Qaeda has been in hiding in the mountains of Libya since 1996. Dirbi is
the current leader of Abu Salim Martyrs Brigade and now is free to walk the streets of Benghazi.”

“The list goes on from here of known terrorists and enemies of the United States that have now not only found sanctuary in Libya, but many have been placed in positions of power. And according to the Libyan exiles, their documentation shows that they all have the knowledge and blessings of the Obama administration.”

Egypt – Obama – Obama helped Egyptian rebels to overthrow the government of Hosni Mubarak. One of the main rebel forces behind the rebellion was the Muslim Brotherhood, a radical Islamic group. Once Mubarak was ousted, Obama fully supported the new Egyptian government controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood and run by Mohamed Morsi. In fact, Obama’s support for the Muslim Brotherhood was so strong that it led one Egyptian newspaper to claim that President Barack Obama was a member of the Muslim Brotherhood. 

Under Morsi’s rule, Egypt’s substantial Coptic Christian population were targeted by not only radical Muslims, but also by police and government agents. Many Christians were beaten, raped, burned and murdered and their homes and churches were looted and burned.

Additionally, the Muslim Brotherhood government of Morsi wanted nothing more than to destroy Israel and the United States. During one cabinet meeting, the Egyptian leadership forgot that the meeting was being televised when the cameras caught Magdi Hussein, the leader of the Islamic Labor Party, saying:

“I’m very fond of battles. With the enemies, of course, with America and Israel, but this battle must be waged with maximum judiciousness and calm. Even though this is a secret meeting we must all take an oath not to leak anything to the media unless it is done officially by Sister Pakinam. We need an official plan for popular national security, even if we did …”

In the light of this and other troubling information concerning Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood government, Congress voted to freeze all military and financial aid and transactions. However, Obama took it upon himself to illegally bypass Congress and send 20 F-16 fighter jets and millions of dollars that had been frozen, to Morsi’s terrorist government.

It’s clear that Obama’s actions amount to nothing less than treason. In fact, a group of Egyptian lawyers have filed charges of criminal terrorism and crimes against humanity against Barack Obama for his involvement with the Muslim Brotherhood. The charges have been filed in the International Criminal Court and similar charges, including treason, need to be filed against him here in the United States for aiding and abetting an enemy of the United States.

Egypt – Clinton – While serving as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton also fully supported Obama’s support of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood government. Her support was enough to bring Egyptian lawyers to file criminal charges in the International Criminal court against Clinton for crimes against humanity, like those filed against Obama.

Reports from Egypt at the time connected then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to domestic terrorism that took place in Egypt under the Muslim Brotherhood. In an interview with Turkey’s Anatolia news agency, Naglaa Mahmoud, the wife of ousted Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi, she admitted her role in the nation’s violence. She told them that she actively worked to help excite domestic insurrections to overthrown Abdel Fatah Al Sisi, the new Deputy Prime Minister of Egypt. Perhaps the most internationally explosive part of her interview was when she said that her actions were in collaboration with Hillary Clinton.”

“Former Muslim Brotherhood activist turned Christian, Walid Shoebat translated part of the interview with Mahmoud. What she said should shock you and should be enough to dash any 2016 presidential hopes of Hillary Clinton, but you know that the liberal mainstream media will keep this buried just as they have buried the news about the charges filed against Obama:”

“Qaffas: According to Anatolia Press, Mahmoud said, ‘I have between my fingers, a treasure trove of secrets from the White House and Mrs. Clinton fears my wrath. ’She said, ‘I will not speak about Huma Abedin’. When asked if she had a close relationship with Hillary Clinton, Mahmoud said, “When my husband returns from his kidnapping, the one who led the coup will pay a hefty price.’ Of Mrs. Clinton, she said, ‘We have a long friendship of many years. We lived in the U.S. and my children learned there. This friendship increased further when my husband became the legitimate president of the country.’

“Mahmoud went on to say that they were recruited by the Clintons from the U.S. and began their friendship in the 1980′s. This appears to be a conspiracy that is being hidden.”

Speaking of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, let’s not forget her closest aid and confident, Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin. What many people may not realize is that there exists an Islamic organization known as the Islamic Sisterhood, a female branch of the Muslim Brotherhood. In 2012, it was learned that there was a list of 63 names of the women leaders of the Muslim Sisterhood. One of those names was Saleha Mahmoud Abedin, the mother of Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin.

Saleha Mahmoud Abedin is a professor and dean at Dar El-Hekma College in Saudi Arabia and according to Walid Shoebat, has been heavily involved in organizations tied to terrorism. He claims to have found numerous accounts in Arab news sources ‘that implicated Huma’s mother as being part of a plot reminiscent of Hitler’s Nazi Germany.’ However, he says that with the rise of Huma Abedin, that much of the information on Saleha has been efficiently cleansed.

Another name on the leadership list for the Muslim Sisterhood was Najla Ali Mahmoud, who just happens to be the wife of the former Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi who was the leader of the militant Muslim Brotherhood. Don’t forget that she is the one who has leveled charges against Hillary Clinton.

Furthermore, at the time Huma Abedin, a devout Muslim was married to then US Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) who is a devout Jew. Knowing the hatred that exists between Muslims and Jews, their marriage is a strange one at best. Normally, a Muslim family would disown a daughter who married a Jew, yet Abedin remained in good standing with her family, again another curiosity begging the question why? As I reported in 2012:

“Have you ever heard of the term Muruna? It’s a Muslim policy that allows someone to lie and deceive in order to gain someone’s complete trust so as to place themselves in a position to gain information useful to the cause. Hamas has used Muruna in a number of ways, one of which is getting a Muslim woman to marry a non-Muslim person of influence in order to learn or gain access to valuable information and secrets.”

“Walid Shoebat suggests that Huma Abedin may in fact be part of a Hamas Muruna plot. He points out that against all Muslim tradition, she married Anthony Weiner, a Jew and the former democratic congressman from New York who resigned in disgrace after his sex scandal. Shoebat tries to support his possible case against Huma by pointing out that she is still a practicing Muslim and as such, was never disavowed by her very Muslim family for marrying a Jew. Additionally, he mentioned that when Weiner resigned he reportedly told a friend, ‘My problem is that I have three women I have to convince that I’m cured: Huma, her mother — and Hillary.’”

“Now, Huma is the closest person to US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and is in a position that gives her access to highly classified documents and information that could prove to be very useful to Hamas and her mother.”

Clearly, Hillary Clinton’s support of the Muslim Brotherhood along with her association with Huma Abedin and her links to the Muslim Sisterhood and Hamas are aiding and abetting our enemies.

As I stated at the beginning, there are numerous other examples that could fill volumes, but I hope I have provided enough evidence to show that both Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton are guilty of treason against the United States as defined by the US Constitution. They both need to be charged, arrested, tried, convicted and summarily executed for their high crimes against our nation.


[by Dave Jolly, writing for CONSTITUTION.com]


NORM ‘n’ AL Note:  The Bible says this, in Numbers 32:23: “You may be sure your sins will find you out.”  It appears we are watching that process at work.




As always, posted for your edification and enlightenment by

NORM ‘n’ AL, Minneapolis



Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Upcoming 2016 election will be Traitors vs. Republicans…

“The Democrats who have approved this deal are turning their party into a party of atom bomb spies. . . They must know that they will be held accountable.  That when Iran detonates its first bomb, their names will be on it.”  —Daniel Greenfield, writing for FrontPageMag.com


What Is Treason, Exactly?

To quote from Article III, Section 3, of the US Constitution, “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”  So, any person who makes war against America, or who aids and abets others in doing so, is a traitor to the United States.  If someone’s actions have the effect of weakening the power of the United States to attack or to resist its enemies, then it can be safely said that aid and comfort have been given.

You can generally only be charged with treason during times of war, but is there any doubt that the Iranian takeover of the American embassy, in 1979, constituted an act of war?  Since there has never been a peace treaty with Iran to formally conclude hostilities, and since Iran was actively fighting and killing US military personnel during the Iraq War, it is safe to say that a state of war continues to exist between Iran and the United States of America.  Thus, any members of Congress accepting Iranian money, in exchange for their votes to weaken American and strengthen Iran, are outright traitors.

The Deal

Iran Nuclear DealThe Iran Deal allows Iran to inspect its own nuclear-weapons-research sites, to enrich uranium, to build more-advanced centrifuges, to purchase Inter-Continental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs), to receive technological support in defending its nuclear program against any possible future American or Israeli attack, and to fund terrorists across the globe.  This deal clearly protects Iran from any possibility of inspection, while enhancing the technological means it already possesses to defend its nuclear program; this can only have the effect of speeding up its ability to build a nuclear bomb.

This deal is, in short, Obama and Kerry’s capitulation to Iran.  The deal is in Iran’s national interest, even while harming the national interest of the United States.  But this should come as no surprise, since the deal was negotiated by traitors and will pass with the help of traitors.  “Traitor” is not a word to be used lightly, and it is not used lightly here.

A Roll-Call of Traitors

The following politicians have all accepted money from the Iran Lobby (which includes the Iranian American Political Action Committee, the American Iranian Council, the Iranian Muslim Association, Hassan Nemazee, Akbar Ghahary, and possibly others) in exchange for their support in negotiating or passing the Iran Deal:

1) Barack Obama, Democrat, President of the United States of America;
2) John Kerry, Democrat, Secretary of State;
3) Edward Markey, Democrat, Junior US Senator from Massachusetts;
4) Al Franken, Democrat, US Senator from Minnesota;
5) Jeanne Shaheen, Democrat, Senator from New Hampshire;
6) Kirsten Gillibrand, Democrat, Senator from New York;
7) Hillary Clinton, Democrat, Former Secretary of State;
8) Joe Biden, Democrat, Vice President of the United States of America.

(Read more details about this at Front Page Mag.)


Closing Remarks

The presence on the list of Obama—who facilitates infiltration of the Muslim Brotherhood into our country and into the Executive Branch of the US government—is no surprise.  (Read more about this infiltration here: http://eaglerising.com/14886/obamas-facilitation-muslim-brotherhood-infiltration-america/.)  Nor is the appearance of the name of John Kerry, who negotiated the Iran Deal, in spite of his being vulnerable to blackmail.  (Read more about Kerry’s feckless failure to recuse himself as lead negotiator here: http://eaglerising.com/22008/anatomy-of-a-betrayal-how-the-blackmail-influenced-the-iran-deal/.)  And, given Hillary’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood through Huma Abedin, perhaps it is not surprising that her name is also on the list.  (Read more about this connection here: http://eaglerising.com/8011/hillary-huma-muslim-brotherhood/.)  But, with Joe Biden’s name also appearing the list, what credible contender can the Democrats field for the presidency in 2016?

[by Paul Dowling, writing for EAGLERISING.COM]


As always, posted for your edification and enlightenment by

NORM ‘n’ AL, Minneapolis

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Clinton-Obama Benghazi story refuted by detailed Defense Department report

At the same time Obama, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and other top leaders were blaming spontaneous protests for the deadly Benghazi attack, the Defense Department broadly circulated a detailed intelligence report that said an al Qaeda-linked group planned the assault 10 days beforehand.

Its goal was to kill as many Americans as possible.

The Defense Intelligence Agency report is contained in a trove of previously classified documents that the government watchdog group Judicial Watch forced the Obama administration to release under court order.

On another terrorism development that has wide implications today, one DIA report in August 2012 predicted the rise of the Islamic State, which was then emerging in Syria. It now controls wide sections of eastern Syria and northern and western Iraq, and is committing mass slaughter of Christians, Kurds and Muslims of rival sects or clans.

Mr. Obama downplayed the Islamic State as the “JV” in January 2014 when the terrorist army made its first incursions into western Iraq.

Judicial Watch said in a statement that the Benghazi documents are clear evidence that Mr. Obama and his aides lied to the American public two months before the November elections. Amid poor security, the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. diplomatic post in Benghazi, Libya, killed Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and an aide. Terrorists later attacked a nearby CIA base, killing two former Navy SEALs serving as a security detail.

Judicial Watch previously forced the administration to release a chain of emails that revealed the tortured process by which White House and State Department political appointees took the CIA’s draft report on the attack and changed it to say the carnage was caused by spontaneous demonstrations over an American-made anti-Islam video.

On Sept. 16, the same date as the DIA report, Susan E. Rice, who then was U.S. ambassador to the United Nations and now is national security adviser, went on Sunday political talk shows and blamed the attack on protesters angered by the video.

The administration could argue this point: The final CIA “talking points” paper was approved Sept. 15. The DIA report saying an al Qaeda-linked group carried out the attack was dated Sept. 16.

But Judicial Watch argues that the information contained in the DIA report was obtained as of Sept. 12, the day after the attack.

The president and Mrs. Clinton took days more to concede that the attack was terrorism and not a protest gone violent. Mr. Obama cited the video later that month in a speech to the U.N.

Matt Olsen, who was serving as director of the National Counterterrorism Center, became the first administration official to publicly call the attacks terrorism, on Sept. 19.  Mrs. Clinton followed suit the next day. But Obama, on that same day, was asked at a town hall meeting about the attack and declined to label it terrorism.

The White House on Tuesday did not respond to a query about the Judicial Watch findings.

Subsequent congressional hearings showed the Benghazi post was on a hit list compiled by terrorists who wanted to rid the city of all Western organizations. The hearings showed that Mr. Stevens repeatedly asked for more security but was rebuffed by Washington.

The Washington Times first reported in October 2012 that a defense intelligence report existed and that it blamed al Qaeda for the Benghazi attack shortly afterward.

The DIA papers obtained by Judicial Watch say the al Qaeda-linked group, Brigades of the Captive Omar Abdul Rahman, claimed responsibility. Rahman is known as the “blind sheikh,” and was convicted and imprisoned for his role in the first World Trade Center attack. The organization is linked to Ansar al-Sharia, a Libyan terrorist group that also took part in the attack on the diplomatic outpost.

“The attack was planned ten or more days prior on approximately 01 September 2012,” the defense report said. “The intention was to attack the consulate and to kill as many Americans as possible to seek revenge for the U.S. killing of [an al Qaeda commander] in Pakistan and in memorial of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center buildings.”

Even more revealing is that the DIA concluded that al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahri was involved. He sent Abdul Baset Azuz, the brigades leader, to Libya to set up an al Qaeda terrorist cell.

“It was stated that Azuz was not a charismatic leader but rather just a violent radical,” the DIA said.

Tom Fitton, Judicial Watch president, called the DIA documents “jaw dropping.” His group sued the administration under the Freedom of Information Act.

“No wonder we had to file more FOIA lawsuits and wait over two years for them,” he said. “If the American people had known the truth — that Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and other top administration officials knew that the Benghazi attack was an al Qaeda terrorist attack from the get-go — and yet lied and covered this fact up — Mitt Romney might very well be president.”

Mr. Fitton said the documents “show that the Benghazi cover-up has continued for years and is only unraveling through our independent lawsuits. The Benghazi scandal just got a whole lot worse for Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.”

The DIA report said Azuz quickly established an al Qaeda headquarters in eastern Libya and obtained Russian-designed shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missiles.

Another document states that the Muslim Brotherhood was allied with al Qaeda in trying to bring down the Bashar Assad regime in Syria. At the time, Mr. Obama supported the elected Muslim Brotherhood government in Egypt, which was later deposed by the military.

“Why would the Obama administration continue to support the Muslim Brotherhood even after it knew it was tied to the Benghazi terrorist attack and to al Qaeda?” Mr. Fitton said.

The Judicial Watch documents also show that the administration was aware of a major arms trafficking network in Libya that took government missiles and guns and shipped them to Islamists in Syria.

There is no indication that the CIA was involved, as some observers asserted.

On the Islamic State, the DIA said in August 2012 that the terrorist army “could also declare an Islamic State throughout its union with other terrorist organizations in Iraq and Syria, which will create grave danger in regards to unifying Iraq and the protection of its territory.”

[by Rowan Scarborough, writing for The Washington Times]

NORM ‘n’ AL Note:  As all of America knows by now, the only “JV team” that really is one is the team in the White House. Biggest bunch of bunglers ever to assume they could lead the USA.


As always, posted for your edification and enlightenment by

NORM ‘n’ AL, Minneapolis

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Friday Free-for-All…

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has a lengthy record of abusing power.

The IRS’s abuse of power is not restricted to targeting tea party groups but it also includes seizing assets of small business owners under the suspicion of engaging in money laundering.

IRS intimidation...Under federal civil asset forfeiture laws the IRS can seize bank accounts of individuals that make a series of deposits or withdrawals of cash under $10,000. Cash transactions under $10,000 are suspicious because they fall under the federal reporting requirement and it’s illegal to avoid the reporting threshold by “structuring” a number of smaller transactions to avoid federal detection.

Most concerning is that civil asset forfeiture allows the IRS to take the money first with the burden falling on the individual to prove their innocence. The guilty first, innocent second twisting of justice puts the IRS in a powerful position.

Since the IRS uses a sledgehammer instead of a scalpel, it has seized the bank accounts of many innocent small businesses that frequently make small cash deposits in its zeal to enforce the “structuring” law.

According to The Institute for Justice, the IRS seized just over $240 million in over 2,500 cases that were considered structured transactions between 2005 and 2012. The Institute for Justice recently released a report, Seize First, Question Later: The IRS and Civil Forfeiture, that analyzes recent cases of civil asset forfeiture.

A recent House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Oversight hearing focused on the abuse of power surrounding the IRS’s civil asset forfeiture laws.

During the hearing, Jeffrey Hirsch, an owner of a convenience store distributor company in Long Island, New York, told the committee how the IRS seized without prior notice almost half a million dollars from his company’s bank account because the IRS felt it was making structured cash deposits.

The IRS held his money for more than two-and-a-half years without making a formal charge before giving all the money back. The actions by the IRS almost drove the company into bankruptcy.

In his testimony, IRS Commissioner John Koskien told the committee that structuring bank transactions is illegal regardless of the source of the funds but he said the IRS will try to zero in on cases where the structured deposits and withdrawals are from illegal activity.

[by Tom Borelli]


Is Obama Readying USA For Islamic Takeover?

Tragically and with full malice aforethought, the beauty, simplicity and essential to thought subject of Logic is no longer taught in the US Public school system. As a note, little else that matters is now taught either. It was taught when I attended school.
For the purposes of this column, I will deal with two forms of logic, as defined by the current 0n-line Merriam-Webster Dictionary: “a particular mode of reasoning viewed as valid or faulty” and “interrelation or sequence of facts or events when seen as inevitable or predictable.” I hope that these will assist those people who still cannot—according to their own words seem to fathom why Barack Hussein Obama does what he does and says what he says.

Note: Too many of these (many high profile) and, ostensibly, Conservative individuals seem to be extremely well-educated but–due to their statements of incredulity over Obama’s actions or lack thereof–are quite apparently lacking the power of even the most basic practice of logical reasoning. That leaves us with Occam’s Razor or “the solution amongst competing hypotheses with the fewest assumptions [the one that possesses the most facts] should be selected.”

Obama's Muslims...Obama is destroying the USA and replacing its legal citizens with Muslims and other illegals, in order to create a new country of his making.  Logic requires rational reasoned thought…not emotion and false premises. Thus…I shall attempt to explain it to them for yet one more time. The rest of you—conservatives specifically–understand perfectly well what’s going on: Christians are responsible for Islamic Violence and their own deaths!

Although they haven’t said it outright–yet– the Obama syndicate members seem poised to soon say that Christians are actually responsible for their own beheadings and burning of the adults and children..many of them infants. Obama recently said that Christians have done horrible things, too. But—and it’s a big one—he had to go back to the over-a-thousand-years-ago Crusades to make his case.

The Crusades were in effect because barbaric and enslaving Islam had taken over Spain and other regions in Europe. In a nutshell, Islam hordes conquered and took Christendom lands, enslaved the people and stole their Holy sites. The Christians fought Islam to get them back. Christianity won. In Obama’s book “Audacity of Hope.” he (or possibly Bill Ayers) writes “…I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.” NORM ‘n’ AL Note: Americans already knew that, didn’t we? But now we know Mr. O actually said he would not stand with his country. How did we ever elect this guy?


Due to its atrocities against humanity, the political winds of the world currently seem to be against Islam…yet, Obama seems bent upon backing them all of the way.  In fact, recently, Obama held two “private” meetings with Muslim Brotherhood members. Please remember that the Brotherhood is the parent of most of the terrorist groups currently on our planet. A handful–hundreds of examples are available–of indicators that Obama stands with and actually fully supports “radical” Islam are as follows:

1. Obama still refuses to use the word Islam when speaking about Islamic terrorists
2. Obama has had “secret” meetings (only recently disclosed) at the White House with the Muslim Brotherhood members in the last month
3. Obama is working with radical Islamic ICNA in its just concluded 3-day “summit” on terrorism
4. The Center for Immigration Studies advised that Obama imported 300,000 Muslims into the USA in 2013 and at least 70,000 Muslims in 2014
5. In 2015, Obama ordered the US State Department to overload the immigration system in order to bring thousands of jihadis into the USA as well as tens of thousands more Muslims. One way or the other, Obama is determined to turn what was once the USA into an Islamic country
6. Every time ISIS or another Islamic terrorist group commits another beheading, live human burning, disembowelment of organs for sale (this is one of the new practices), Obama makes excuses for them. At a press conference 19 February 2015, Obama said that the terrorists “may have legitimate grievances.” WHAT?


Everything Obama and the Islamo-Nazi new world order is now doing is designed to implement the “Final Solution” for the USA…that of the North American Caliphate which Obama plans to head. President Ronald Reagan’s “America a shining city upon a hill whose beacon light guides freedom-loving people everywhere” will be destroyed and extinguished at last. As it is, the flicker of my home country is very dim now, indeed.


As I’ve written before, my ancestral family members built the United States of America from the ground up and I have been witnessing its dismantling. Although I view Barack Hussein Obama as a loathsome creature, even more offensive are those who refused to lift a hand to stop him and those who affected the pretense of being of, for and by the people but, who willingly betrayed their fellow humans for the promise of power in this planned New Dark World and a few pieces of silver. And, to them, I say whether you choose to believe it or not truth is truth and our Creator God is watching. Even so, Lord, come soon…


[by Sher Zieve, writing for BARBWIRE]


Then the Lord saw that the wickedness of man was great on the earth, and that every intent of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. And the Lord was sorry that He had made man on the earth, and He was grieved in His heart.  (Genesis 6:5-6)


The wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand.” (Daniel 12: 10)

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Mr. O tells another obvious and monster lie…

What’s Obama’s latest monster lie? Muslims helped in “building the very fabric of our nation.”

We have seen that there is truly no outrageous lie Barack Obama (or whatever his name is) won’t tell, and he lied yet again in a White House statement from July 27th in “honor” of the end of Islam’s current Ramadan holiday.

In part, the statement reads: “…reminds us of the many achievements and contributions of Muslim Americans to building the very fabric of our nation and strengthening the core of our democracy.”

It’s easy to wonder what the heck he meant by that statement, although taqiyya and contemptible revisionist history come to mind.  The truth is that Islam played no part in either the founding of the United States or in its growth into the great, blessed nation it became by the 20th Century.  In fact, a case could be made that Islam has contributed nothing positive either to the United States or to the entire world, throughout the history of its dark and violent existence.

Islam helped to build the "very fabric" of the USA? Give us a break!

I am sick of the “political correctness” that plagues our nation and the western world.  It is nothing more than a tyrannical clamp on freedom of speech and expression, and it makes far too many otherwise sensible people afraid to tell the plain truth about Islam.  Islam is an evil, barbaric political-militant ideology couched in a religion.  It is a cancer of obscene brutality and oppression.

Tragically for the United States, Obama is, at the very least, highly sympathetic to Islam, and he continues to be on the side of the Muslim enemies of America and Israel.  He has aided and abetted the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas in the Middle East.  He has, without congressional authorization, released top Taliban terrorists from U.S. captivity.  He has shown the demonic hatred toward Israel that Muslims display.  He has installed Muslim Brotherhood operatives in positions of power throughout his administration and the federal government.  And now, he wants to rewrite America’s history to include “many” fictional Muslim “achievements and contributions.”

On Sunday, WorldNetDaily published a complete smack-down of Obama’s senseless Ramadan statement.  Titled, “Founding Fathers Rip Obama’s Muslim ‘Fabric,’” the column does just that, stating, in part:

Far from incorporating Islam into America’s early tapestry, their own writings reveal the Founding Fathers were at war with the creed and its adherents.

In 1801, President Jefferson sent the Navy to the Barbary Coast to stop Islamic pirates’ reign of terror on U.S. merchant ships. Jefferson read the Quran to understand what was motivating the pirates, and he learned that the Muslim holy book commanded the faithful to “plunder and enslave” non-Muslims.

In 1814, after Tripoli broke its truce and began attacking U.S. ships again, former President John Adams wrote Jefferson a letter advising that Islam’s founder and prophet was “a military fanatic.” In another writing, he condemned Islamic law as “contemptible.”

His son and future president, John Quincy Adams, went further, arguing that the essence of Islam is “violence and lust: to exalt the brutal over the spiritual part of human nature.” He suggested the Quran’s commands to fight and conquer other lands “in the cause of Allah” were at odds with democracy, peace and the Judeo-Christian ethic on which America was founded.

Even back then, Islam was the same violent, backward ideology it is today.  It is easily arguable that our Founding Fathers would be adamantly opposed to the notion that the practice of Islam was intended to be protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution of our nation, which was founded on Judeo-Christian precepts.  Far from contributing to its “very fabric,” Islam is utterly opposed to our nation’s foundation, its freedoms and its way of life.

The WorldNetDaily column goes on to point out that there was no mosque in America until 1934, that no Muslims are reported to have fought in the Civil War or World War I, that no Muslims established their own political group until the 1980s, that no Muslim was elected to Congress until 2007 and today, that Muslims make up less than one percent of the U.S. population.  I’ve also never heard of any Muslim colonists or Muslim Founding Fathers.

Besides again claiming that the United States is a democracy, which it isn’t, Obama wrote in his statement that the Islamic holiday, “… celebrates the common values that unite us in our humanity and reinforces the obligations that people of all faiths have to each other…”  Tell that to the 9-11 victims.  Tell that to the Christians and others who are being butchered by Muslim animals over in Iraq, Syria and other hell holes of Islamic supremacism around the world.  We have seen the gruesome images and videos of mass beheadings, shootings and crucifixions of people—most of them their fellow Muslims—by these demon-possessed barbarians.  There is no “humanity” in these bloody Muslim savages, much less “common values” between them and the civilized world.

For Barack Obama to open his lying mouth and falsely claim that Muslims contributed to the “very fabric” of the United States is an affront to all American victims of Muslim violence, every military death, and every battle that was fought to establish this, the greatest, freest nation in the history of the world and the very antithesis of all Islam stands for.

[by Gina Miller, writing for BARBWIRE.COM]


As always, posted for your edification and enlightenment by

NORM ‘n’ AL, Minneapolis




Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

What do you call a president who helps US enemies?

The world is aflame, it is happening on Obama’s watch, the Democrats have been in power for eight years, and Americans are increasingly furious over serial failures by the regime in Washington.

Talk of impeachment is a side-show.  Many people say Obama should be tried for treason because he has provided aid and comfort to jihadists, our sworn enemies.  How credible is this accusation?  Consider recent history.

In Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood is now on the run and Morsi is in prison, but Barack Obama helped Morsi come to power and propped up his Sharia-based regime by funding the Brotherhood, paving the way by helping remove Mubarak from power.

Remember that the Brotherhood is the long-standing jihadist organization that gave birth to Al Qaeda.   The Brotherhood, like Iran and many others, considers the U.S. the great Satan.  The Brotherhood calls for our complete annihilation.  Details of some of Obama’s direct support for the Brotherhood can be studied here, here and here.

Making matters worse, Obama has welcomed Brotherhood members into our government.   Many of these Brotherhood operatives hold sensitive positions inside our security apparatus.   This would be comparable to FDR allowing Nazis to serve in the Defense Department in 1942.

Our illustrious president...Additionally, in an almost hysterical attempt to cobble together a cease-fire in Gaza, the Obama Administration recently sought the favor of Qatar and Turkey, both totally hostile to our ally Israel, both firm supporters of Hamas, both nation states which fund Hamas.  It is as if Obama is trying to save Hamas while talking tough about supporting Israel, more evidence of this regime’s pattern of corruption and deception.  This report claims Kerry and Obama are not only trying to save Hamas, they are trying to restore the Brotherhood in the process.

Furthermore, you remember Obama’s red line in Syria, the one that turned pink, and then vanished?  Guess what?  Funding for jihadists including Al Qaeda in Syria is also part of the treasonous Obama legacy.

Excerpt – “The Syrian opposition groups are increasingly dominated by radical Islamists, many of them foreign fighters who, the UN says, are involved in numerous crimes committed in Syria. According to estimates of defense consultancy IHS Jane’s, more than a half of the forces fighting to topple President Bashar Assad government are jihadists.

Now that an earnest investigation into Benghazi has commenced, many observers predict we will finally get confirmation the U.S. helped transfer Libyan weapons to jihadists in Syria with Turkish assistance and that a large part of the deterioration in Benghazi at the consulate had to do with those weapons transfers.

It should be noted as well that Obama’s illegal military action to topple Qaddafi turned Libya into a war zone where tribal rivalries play out in violence across the country and where terrorists find free reign to train and wage jihad.

Finally, Obama has consistently refused to support liberation movements in Iran and elsewhere, and, he has consistently funded and supported jihadist movements as noted, including Hamas and Hezbollah.   Please do not forget Obama purposefully pulled out of Iraq prematurely allowing ISIS to take half the country, slaughtering thousands.

The record is very clear. The man who would be king, once claiming to be a Christian, is in reality a jihadist sympathizer and collaborator who funds, helps and comforts our enemies. He is a man who therefore deserves to be charged with treason.

[by Allan Erickson, writing for BARBWIRE.COM]

As always, posted for your edification and enlightenment by
NORM ‘n’ AL, Minneapolis

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Obama administration declares Al Qaeda no longer a threat to the US; intelligence officials declare exactly the opposite…

This should come as no surprise from an administration that sets up Muslim Brotherhood members in top positions in the federal government, aids the avowed enemies of the US, and has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. Members of the Obama administration, including National Security Adviser Susan Rice and White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough apparently met with senators from both sides of the aisle late Tuesday. According to several of those senators, the meeting was focused on foreign policy and was supposed to be secret, but Yahoo News received comment from some of those senators.

Remember 9-11?

Those nice, peace-loving Al Qaeda Muslims, the ones who are now not a threat to the US, are the ones who did this. Do we remember? THEY DO!


Sen. Bob Corker, the top Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, alluded to the meeting on Wednesday, as the panel held a hearing on whether and how to overhaul the signature law of the global war on terrorism.

“I know we both attended sort of a discussion last night that I found to be one of the most bizarre I’ve attended on Foreign Relations on foreign policy in our country,”
 Corker said at one point, referring to himself and Sen. Bob Menendez (D.-New Jersey), the committee’s chairman.

“I know several of us were involved in a very bizarre discussion last night. This continues a very bizarre discussion,” Corker said at another point.

The Tennessee Republican did not say where or with whom the meeting took place (or why it was bizarre).

The White House later confirmed the meeting. National Security Council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden said McDonough hosted “an informal discussion on national security issues,” and that Rice and Deputy National Security Adviser Tony Blinken attended.

Now, consider that this is the administration really has no desire to hurt their fellow Muslim jihadists in the least. In fact, McDonough was intimately involved in the Benghazi coverup.

However, in one of the most curious places for the truth to come out, The Daily Beast reported:

…the White House has softened its earlier position, concluding that al Qaeda and its affiliates still represented a serious threat. But the tension between the White House and many top military and intelligence officials fighting the long war remain.

In interviews with many of them, a common theme is sounded: The threat from al Qaeda is rising, but the White House is looking to ratchet down the war against these Islamic extremists. As a result, intelligence gathered on these threats remain shrouded from the public and, in many cases, from senior government officials. And now Congress and the White House are beginning to consider modifying—and possibly revoking—the very authority to find, fix and finish those terrorists who pose the threat today.

Now, clearly we are not talking “Islamic extremists,” but rather we are speaking of devout Muslims who are simply following the Qur’an, just as the founder of Islam did when he formed the political ideology. Also, keep in mind that it was the Obama administration that was claiming that al-Qaeda was on the run and that Osama bin Laden was dead.

Again, it should come as no surprise seeing we have an administration involved in open treason, in which an impotent Congress will not impeach him.

More from Al Qaeda...

More work by those nice, peace-loving Al Qaeda

However, while Congress isn’t calling Obama on this issue, many in the intelligence community are. According to The Daily Beast:

One senior U.S. intelligence official told The Daily Beast the frustration was that there is pressure from the White House to downplay the threat from some al Qaeda affiliates. “It comes from the top, it’s the message that al Qaeda is all these small franchise groups and they are not coordinated and threatening,” this official said. “It’s the whole idea of getting us out to place resources against something that they don’t think is a problem. It’s not their war, it’s not our conflict.”

This week, this internal struggle over the response to al Qaeda is reaching a crucial moment. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Wednesday will hold a nearly unprecedented hearing on the 2001 law that authorizes a long, global war against al Qaeda and its allies.

At the same time, U.S. intelligence officers say, there is deep division within their ranks–and with the White House—about the strength of al Qaeda in the place where that war began: Afghanistan. The current estimate of the terror group’s presence there says that al Qaeda has a little more than 100 fighters in the country’s province of Kunar. That, these intelligence officers contend, is wildly out of date. “Al Qaeda has a presence all over Afghanistan today,” a senior U.S. intelligence official told The Daily Beast. “This is the conversation that no one wants to have. What are they going to do after 2014 when most of our troops will be gone?”

“It comes from the top, it’s the message that al Qaeda is all these small franchise groups and they are not coordinated and threatening. It’s not their war, it’s not our conflict.”

Take a moment and consider that this administration’s former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, failed to designate Boko Haram as a terrorist group. They have also failed to call the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist group, even when Egypt did so. They have claimed Al-Qaeda is on the run, yet covered up the fact that jihadists tied to Al-Qaeda were the very ones who attacked Americans in Benghazi. Why did they cover it up? I believe part of the reason was that Obama and Joe Biden were proudly declaring Al-Qaeda was on the run.

However, as one senior U.S. intelligence official said, “Take this ‘al Qaeda is on the run’ message, it’s something you’ve seen in the last couple of years. If they are on the run, they are on the run to the United States.”

Pamela Geller summed up exactly what is taking place concerning the Obama administration’s willful ignorance of what Islam and jihadists are engaging in and who will feel the brunt of what they are doing. She wrote, “As the global jihad rages across Africa, the Middle East, Europe and Asia, Obama continues to indulge his ROP fantasies to our great peril.”

At least there are still some who recognize the threat and are willing to stand up and be counted.
[by Tim Brown, writing for FREEDOM OUTPOST]


As always, posted for your edification and enlightenment by

NORM ‘n’ AL, Minneapolis



Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

IRS quickly approved Muslim group tied to terrorism while targeting Christians and conservatives…

We’ve all heard about the IRS targeting of Tea Party and conservative groups applying for non-profit status.  Some IRS agents tried to use their positions to coerce or extort some groups to stop picketing or protesting against Planned Parenthood.  Some Tea Party groups spent almost 3 years waiting to get their non-profit status, while Obama’s half-brother Malik got his non-profit status in only 34 days.

While the IRS has been busy targeting people like you and me, they’ve ignored other groups that have illegal dealings with known Muslim terrorists, according to the American Freedom Law Center.  The AFLC has filed additional documents with the IRS concerning the activities to CAIR, the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

AFLC Co-Founder and Senior Counsel, David Yerushalmi, says that CAIR has ‘elaborate ties to terrorism, abuse of tax codes and corporate law, and…deliberate deception’ in regards to their use of shell-corporations and suspicious funding sources. He also says that CAIR has ties to terrorist groups including the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas.

Yerushalmi and the AFLC have spent the past four years filing documents with the IRS and the federal government to prove that CAIR has been operating illegally.  They discovered that CAIR has not filed any income tax returns for three years prior to filing for tax exempt status.  Once they applied, an application that set off a host of red flags, the IRS readily approved CAIR’s application.

In an interview with OneNewsNow, Yerushalmi said:

“While they [the IRS] were holding up perfectly legitimate applications for the 501(c)(3) status, here they simply overlooked and looked past all of these red flags and granted an immediate (c)(3) status for CAIR.”

“I don’t believe for a moment that CAIR is going to be existing in another year or two … because we have a lawsuit against them for fraud, and I think that the judgment on that will bankrupt them, but even more so, I think what we have planned for them in the coming months will essentially reduce them to a non-entity — and it’s about time.”

With the fall of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, perhaps their support here in the US will dwindle as well.  Yerushalmi hopes that Congress will get involved and start demanding answers as to how CAIR was approved so readily, even after they were red flagged and conservatives were not.  Or will Obama exert his powers to protect them as he seems to have been doing since taking office?

[by Dave Jolly, writing for Godfather Politics]


As always, posted for your edification and enlightenment by

NORM ‘n’ AL, Minneapolis


Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Obama is funding radical Islam through Egypt…

It was Albert Einstein who said “Weakness of attitude becomes weakness of character.”

I would switch that idea around, and say that weakness of character begets weakness of attitude. Without solid character, one does not have the correct attitude to lead. In order to be a leader of men, one must have a firm grip on the reality in which we live. One must understand when it is time to act, when it is time to withdraw, and when it is time to stand still. When one does not posses firm character, major judgment calls can become difficult, and be made irresponsibly.

I’ll be forthright and say it: Obama does not possess firm character. That is why, over the course of his administration, we have seen him make so many poor decisions. He has continuously made choices that benefit only him and his Party. Those choices have done massive damage to the American economy, to our foreign policy, and to the American people at large.

One particular choice made by Obama about which I was particularly leery was his decision to continue sending billions of dollars in aid to Egypt following the election of Mohammed Morsi. Morsi is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood—a group of radical Islamists. There were reports that some of his opponents were being executed following his election, and reports of extreme Christian persecution. In addition, Morsi has swiftly consolidated power, taking it from the judicial system and giving to himself.

Just as a reference, Morsi is the man who reportedly said this: “They [non-Muslims] need to know that conquest is coming, that Egypt will be Islamic, and they must pay jizya or emigrate.”

And this: “The Koran is our Constitution, the prophet is our leader, jihad is our path, and death in the name of Allah is our goal.”

Even if these quotes are exaggerated or fabricated entirely (I don’t think they are), the fact still remains that he was a very involved member of the Muslim Brotherhood—a group of radical Islamists.

Once Morsi was elected, and began becoming despotic, we should have cut off all aid to Egypt. However, that was not the case. It is only now—because of the popular and military uprising—that Obama is considering cutting off aid.

It is US law that aid must be cut off when a coup takes place; however, we have been providing cash to Egypt for decades, regardless of the circumstances. So, at the risk of sounding like a crazy conspiracy theorist, I ask the question: Why?

Why cut off aid now, rather than before? Why continue to provide a radical Islamist leader with US money? Why not support this uprising, like he supported the last one that brought Morsi to power?

Barack Obama is not—I repeat—not a Muslim. That does not mean, however, that he does not support radical Islam. Obama is a secular humanist, pretending to be a Christian. At best, he’s an agnostic. It is important to know where he stands in regard to Islam, and his own spirituality—or lack thereof—because it informs his decisions politically.

All of the questions I asked need to be answered. But more than that, without answering a single question, Obama is demonstrating an extraordinary weakness of judgment. This weakness of judgment shows a weakness of character.

Were I to read Obama’s mind, I might see two things: fear and opportunity. Obama may be afraid of radical Islam in Egypt. He might be so afraid, that he is willing to back the Muslim Brotherhood over a more secular government because he fears retaliation if he does not.

The other option is opportunity. He may realize that by first backing Morsi, then turning around and backing a revolution against him, he makes himself appear schizophrenic. It makes him look like he does not know what he is doing in regard to foreign policy.

Regardless of what is really going on, Obama has shown a severe weakness of character. Either option is bad for his image in one way or another. All he can do now is play catch-up, which is the game of characterless men.

[by Frank Camp, writing for LAST RESISTANCE]


As always, posted for your edification and enlightenment by

NORM ‘n’ AL, Minneapolis


Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized