Tag Archives: Eagle Rising

The truth about Benghazi…and why Democrats are determined to hide it

Liars lineup...If you’re an American, YOU DESERVE TO KNOW THE TRUTH about everything your government does (unless knowing that truth compromises national security). Mr. O came into office promising “the most transparent administration in history” but soon gave us the most inept, unprepared, and dishonest administration in history…and the most NON-transparent. Mr. O thinks you deserve to know NOTHING unless he is forced to disclose it to you.

Unless it threatens national security, Americans deserve to know the truth. So it is with Benghazi. Therefore, the rapidly approaching testimony by Secretary Clinton has the potential of finally providing some of the answers we ought to have had years ago. Why was security was so lax, why was no military help sent in a timely manner, and why did the Obama Administration attempt to blame an internet video for the attack even though they knew this wasn’t true?

The answers to all three questions are actually pretty obvious, but without definitive proof, getting the major media motivated enough to report the facts won’t happen. This is why the Democrats are so determined, even desperate, to hide what really happened and why. Consider how the Democrats are seizing on the recent statement by Rep. McCarthy to bolster their claim that the Benghazi hearings are nothing but a political witch hunt by Republicans. That, along with the claims that the matter has already been investigated and that we shouldn’t be wasting taxpayer’s money, are all pretty pathetic if you stop to examine each assertion.

For starters, the McCarthy comment, while ill-advised, is like a homeowner chortling about finding a stash of gold coins while remodeling his house. The Benghazi committee wasn’t looking to find that Sec. Clinton had a private email server any more than the homeowner was looking for the gold when tearing down a wall. However, by claiming that motive, the Democrats hope to discredit the Benghazi committee’s potential findings. It also keeps the narrative away from the truth. As for the claim that all this has already been investigated and no misconduct was proven, that goes against common sense. We now know that many emails and other evidence and testimony were deliberately withheld by the Obama Administration before those earlier hearings. Finally, the contention that the Democrats don’t want to “waste” taxpayer money is ludicrous considering how much taxpayer money Democrats routinely squander on things like the Cowboy Poetry Festival, Star Trek training videos, and studies of shrimp on treadmills.

The reality that the Democrats want concealed is that this is an incompetent administration. Ignoring the facts on the ground regarding security in Libya was just one of many examples of ineptitude by the Obama Administration. From little things like misspelling the Russian reset button to major problems like the pathetic Obamacare website rollout, too many people President Obama has put in important positions of authority have performed poorly. Responsibility rolls downhill like snowballs and other stuff. Admitting that the State Department dropped the ball on Libyan security wouldn’t just have made Hillary look bad, it would have reflected poorly on the president who put her in charge. That would hurt the Democrat Party and so they wanted to hide the truth.

The same thing accounts for the lack of a quick response to an attack that went on for hours. That Hillary Clinton was right about Obama not being up to responding to a 3:00 a.m. phone call was ironic since she wasn’t ready either. Neither Obama nor Clinton was able to make a quick and decisive response. Their excuse was that help wouldn’t have gotten there in time. That couldn’t have possibly been known in advance, and at the very least should have tried. Whether there was a “stand down” order given, or whether a “go” order was withhold while they dithered, either would have made them look bad. So, again, Democrats wanted to hide the facts.

Finally, remember at the time this happened the election was in doubt. The Obama narrative was that Bin Laden was dead and that Al Qaeda was no longer a threat. Further, they claimed that the “Arab Spring” was going to bring peace and democracy to the area. Admitting that organized terrorists were able to attack and kill an American ambassador would have made that assertion look as foolish as it has turned out to be. Therefore, blaming a video, which the Administration absolutely tried to do, would prevent embarrassing facts from affecting the election.

The problem is that only definitive confirmation of these truths will motivate the major media to cover this. I have high hopes, but low expectations, that Sec. Clinton’s testimony will finally provide enough evidence to force the mainstream media to report the truth. However, we have no idea how much evidence is still hidden or destroyed, so this may not happen.
Whether Clinton or Biden is the ultimate nominee, the Democrat Party and their media allies will continue to deny, delay, and hope the public never becomes aware of the truth.

[by Nicholas Wishek, writing for EAGLE RISING]
NORM ‘n’ AL Note:  The Democrats want to “conceal that this is an incompetent administration”? Of course they do…but it’s MUCH TOO LATE for that. Americans have realized for years now that they voted into office the most incompetent president ever to occupy the Oval Office. We can only hope the lesson has been well learned that the office demands a man of principles and experience. Mr. O had neither…and still does not have the first of those two qualities.
………………………………………….
As always, posted for your edification and enlightenment by
NORM ‘n’ AL, Minneapolis
normal@usa1usa.com
612.239.0970

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Upcoming 2016 election will be Traitors vs. Republicans…

“The Democrats who have approved this deal are turning their party into a party of atom bomb spies. . . They must know that they will be held accountable.  That when Iran detonates its first bomb, their names will be on it.”  —Daniel Greenfield, writing for FrontPageMag.com

 

What Is Treason, Exactly?

To quote from Article III, Section 3, of the US Constitution, “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”  So, any person who makes war against America, or who aids and abets others in doing so, is a traitor to the United States.  If someone’s actions have the effect of weakening the power of the United States to attack or to resist its enemies, then it can be safely said that aid and comfort have been given.

You can generally only be charged with treason during times of war, but is there any doubt that the Iranian takeover of the American embassy, in 1979, constituted an act of war?  Since there has never been a peace treaty with Iran to formally conclude hostilities, and since Iran was actively fighting and killing US military personnel during the Iraq War, it is safe to say that a state of war continues to exist between Iran and the United States of America.  Thus, any members of Congress accepting Iranian money, in exchange for their votes to weaken American and strengthen Iran, are outright traitors.

The Deal

Iran Nuclear DealThe Iran Deal allows Iran to inspect its own nuclear-weapons-research sites, to enrich uranium, to build more-advanced centrifuges, to purchase Inter-Continental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs), to receive technological support in defending its nuclear program against any possible future American or Israeli attack, and to fund terrorists across the globe.  This deal clearly protects Iran from any possibility of inspection, while enhancing the technological means it already possesses to defend its nuclear program; this can only have the effect of speeding up its ability to build a nuclear bomb.

This deal is, in short, Obama and Kerry’s capitulation to Iran.  The deal is in Iran’s national interest, even while harming the national interest of the United States.  But this should come as no surprise, since the deal was negotiated by traitors and will pass with the help of traitors.  “Traitor” is not a word to be used lightly, and it is not used lightly here.

A Roll-Call of Traitors

The following politicians have all accepted money from the Iran Lobby (which includes the Iranian American Political Action Committee, the American Iranian Council, the Iranian Muslim Association, Hassan Nemazee, Akbar Ghahary, and possibly others) in exchange for their support in negotiating or passing the Iran Deal:

1) Barack Obama, Democrat, President of the United States of America;
2) John Kerry, Democrat, Secretary of State;
3) Edward Markey, Democrat, Junior US Senator from Massachusetts;
4) Al Franken, Democrat, US Senator from Minnesota;
5) Jeanne Shaheen, Democrat, Senator from New Hampshire;
6) Kirsten Gillibrand, Democrat, Senator from New York;
7) Hillary Clinton, Democrat, Former Secretary of State;
8) Joe Biden, Democrat, Vice President of the United States of America.

(Read more details about this at Front Page Mag.)

 

Closing Remarks

The presence on the list of Obama—who facilitates infiltration of the Muslim Brotherhood into our country and into the Executive Branch of the US government—is no surprise.  (Read more about this infiltration here: http://eaglerising.com/14886/obamas-facilitation-muslim-brotherhood-infiltration-america/.)  Nor is the appearance of the name of John Kerry, who negotiated the Iran Deal, in spite of his being vulnerable to blackmail.  (Read more about Kerry’s feckless failure to recuse himself as lead negotiator here: http://eaglerising.com/22008/anatomy-of-a-betrayal-how-the-blackmail-influenced-the-iran-deal/.)  And, given Hillary’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood through Huma Abedin, perhaps it is not surprising that her name is also on the list.  (Read more about this connection here: http://eaglerising.com/8011/hillary-huma-muslim-brotherhood/.)  But, with Joe Biden’s name also appearing the list, what credible contender can the Democrats field for the presidency in 2016?

[by Paul Dowling, writing for EAGLERISING.COM]

………………………………………

As always, posted for your edification and enlightenment by

NORM ‘n’ AL, Minneapolis
normal@usa1usa.com
612.239.0970

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized