They say that lightening never strikes twice in the same place. Not true.
It usually will strike at least twice, often more, if you stand high atop a cliff’s edge with a lightning rod above your head during a thunderstorm. In fact, in the unlikely event you survive the first strike, it’ll keep right on striking until you climb down.
So-called “gun-free zones” are like lightning rods for mass murder. It’s time we climbed down from the cliff’s edge.
This week America mourns yet another needless and preventable mass shooting at Fort Hood, Texas. When will gun-grabbing liberals learn?
In a blunt and provocatively titled, though well-reasoned post, submitted shortly after Wednesday’s shooting, Gateway Pundit’s Jim Hoft charged: “Obama Is Responsible for Latest Fort Hood Murders – Still a Gun-Free Zone.”
“In 2009 Islamist killer Nidal Malik Hasan, a U.S. Army major and psychiatrist, fatally shot 13 people and injured more than 30 others at Fort Hood, Texas. Fort Hood was a gun-free zone.
“Hasan reportedly screamed, ‘Allahu Akbar!’ as he committed his mass murder. Barack Obama termed this Islamic terrorist attack – workplace violence. Complete lunacy.
“After the first mass killing nothing changed. Fort Hood is still a gun-free zone. President Bill Clinton’s gun-free policies are still in place.
“Today there was another mass shooting at Fort Hood. Soldiers were told to take cover and hide like cowards as a crazed gunman shot at least 14 Americans on base. The shooter, Ivan Lopez, then shot himself in the head.
“These deaths are the result of failed policies. These deaths are the result of a dangerous ‘gun free zone’ policy.
“The Obama administration is responsible for this mass shooting. They witnessed this before. They didn’t learn a thing. Gun-free zones are death zones,” concluded Hoft.
Of course, no one but Ivan Lopez is responsible for his own criminally horrific actions. Still, this Obama administration is likewise responsible for its own criminally horrific incompetence.
By maintaining his demonstrably failed “gun-free zone” policy at Fort Hood (or anywhere in the country for that matter), Obama may as well broadcast: “Hey, would-be mass murderers, we’ve got a whole lot of unarmed soldiers here. Come and finish ‘em off!”
This president is undeniably culpable. His reckless insistence upon preserving this obtuse, liberal – but I repeat myself – gun-grabbing policy rendered defenseless, once again, the fine servicemen and women of Fort Hood. It kept in place the same mass-murder-rich environment in which Nidal Malik Hasan committed the first Fort Hood “fish-in-a-barrel” soldier hunt.
And the only people surprised are you gun-control nutters.
Here’s the thing about liberalism, which is really cultural Marxism, euphemistically tagged “progressivism”: It’s never worked and it never will. It can’t. It’s a material impossibility. “Progressivism” can no more work than can one answer a nonsense question like, “How big is blue?” As with all similar such humanistic efforts to achieve a man-made earthly utopia, “progressivism” is a hopeless non-starter.
Why? Because “progressivism” is utterly detached from reality. There’s truth, and then there’s “progressivism.” Central to every single “progressive” policy, without exception, is the fatally flawed denial of the existence of sin – of man’s fallen nature. There’s also a stupidly stubborn refusal to acknowledge the reality of moral absolutes. “Progressivism” is built upon a utopian, relativist house of cards; and when that house comes crashing down, the results are often deadly.
On Wednesday America witnessed liberalism’s deadly results first hand. A public policy that intentionally disarms American citizens – much less American soldiers – is a policy that creates a pond full of sitting ducks; this, whether we have a terrorist behind the trigger, or a government with designs on tyranny.
Notice a trend here? What do Sandy Hook Elementary, Aurora Colorado’s Century 16 theatre, Columbine, Fort Hood No. 1 and Fort Hood No. 2 all have in common? They’re all “gun-free zones.”
Oh, that rather than “gun-free zone,” each of these terror sites had a sign reading: “Staff heavily armed and trained. Any attempts to harm those herein will be met with deadly force.” Perhaps some of our beautiful souls would not die before one or more well-armed good guys could take out the well-armed bad guys. We will never know how many precious lives could be saved.
Albert Einstein famously quipped that the definition of insanity is “doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” In that sense, “progressives” are insane.
Or are they? “Crazy like a fox” maybe?
Either way, they’re certainly no Einsteins.
I’ll admit that many “progressives” are generally well-meaning, sincere, and decent people. I even have a handful of “progressive” friends who have yet to see the light. I love ‘em, but they just want what they can’t have – at least not until that glorious last trumpet. They want heaven on earth.
So it’s not for a lack of sincerity that “progressives” are destroying America. Lots of people are sincere every day and still wrong, in all sorts of ways.
It’s called a failure to grasp reality.
[by Matt Barber, writing for WND.com]
NORM ‘n’ AL Note: Training our military forces and then turning the bases where we tell them to live and work into “gun-free zones” is sheer lunacy. Knives are weapons, too. Maybe we should turn all restaurants into “knife-free zones.” Makes just as much sense…
As always, posted for your edification and enlightenment by
NORM ‘n’ AL, Minneapolis